Thursday, May 23, 2013
Woolwich Suspects 'Known To Security Services'
Police search houses in Greenwich and Lincolnshire as it emerges the two suspects were not considered an immediate threat by MI5.
The two terror suspects being held under armed guard at hospitals in London were both known to security services, Government sources say.
The men - who were apparently assessed by MI5 as not posing a threat requiring "immediate intervention" - were arrested following the hacking to death of a serving soldier in the street in Woolwich, southeast London.
Sky's crime correspondent Martin Brunt said one suspect had been identified as Michael Adeboloja, a 28-year-old Londoner of Nigerian descent.
Police investigating the attack have been searching an address in Greenwich and another in Lincolnshire, believed to be connected to Adeboloja.
Brunt added: "We believe it is his father's house that is being searched by Lincolnshire Police on behalf of counter-terrorism command at Scotland Yard."
Relatives of the dead soldier are believed to have been informed and his identity is expected to be released later today. A post mortem is being carried out on the body.
A Facebook page in honour of the Woolwich victim has received around one million 'likes'.
Counter-terrorism officers are leading the investigation into the "shocking and horrific" murder and the Prime Minister has held talks with his top advisers to address potential security implications.
Two suspected Muslim fanatics attacked the man in the street a short distance from the Royal Artillery Barracks after apparently knocking him down with their car.
Witnesses said they set about the soldier with a number of weapons, which appeared to include knives and a meat cleaver, while shouting the name of "Allah".
Monsanto GMO Poisons & Seeds of Death exposed
Seeds of Death: Unveiling The Lies of GMO's - Full Movie
The world's leading Scientists, Physicians, Attorneys, Politicians and Environmental Activists expose the corruption and dangers surrounding the widespread use of Genetically Modified Organisms in the new feature length documentary, "Seeds of Death: Unveiling the Lies of GMOs".
Senior Executive Producer / Writer / Director: Gary Null PhD
Executive Producer/Writer/Co-Director: Richard Polonetsky
Producers: Paola Bossola, Richard Gale, James Spruill, Patrick Thompson, Valerie Van Cleve
Editors: James Spruill, Patrick Thompson, Richie Williamson, Nick Palm
Music: Kevin MacLeod (Incompetech.com), Armando Guarnera
Graphics: Jay Graygor
The Future For Retirees In America Is Grim ~ John Embry
Sprott's John Embry: 'The Future For Retirees In America Is Grim'
John Embry, Chief Investment Strategist at Sprott Asset Management. John Embry discuss recent volatility and panic in the gold and silver markets. According to John Embry markets are now highly oversold. He mentions the "leap day slaughter" and the counterintuitive situation in which gold and silver prices went down on the backdrop of negative economic news and money printing. Natural selling followed forced selling. Embry thinks the bottom is being tested right now and that there's a lot of upward potential with limited risk. He notes that if you're negative on gold, you must be bullish on currencies, which doesn't make sense in the current environment.
Whistleblowers Risk Their Lives in the US
Fate of whistleblowers in the US
Over the past three and a half years the Obama White House has shown a ferocious hostility to many whistleblowers and earned itself the ire of progressive columnists like Salon's Glenn Greenwald and whistleblower defense groups like the Project on Government Oversight and the Government Accountability Project.
From Bradley Manning who has become invisible in the American eye to others. The Obama Administration has become far worse than Bush.
Wednesday, May 22, 2013
Michelle Malkin VS Leslie Marshall Heated Debate on London Terror - Hannity - 5/22/13
5/22/13 - Sean Hannity tonight led a heated panel discussion on the horrifying terrorist attack in London today. He and Michelle Malkin credited Prime Minister David Cameron with immediately labeling it a terrorist act, saying that liberal political correctness would have prevented that if such an attack occurred in the United States. Malkin got into a shouting match with fellow panelist Leslie Marshall over how the U.S. has responded to acts of Islamic violence, going so far as to say political correctness on Islam leads to dead bodies.
Hannity doubted that had this attack occurred in the United States, the government would not have quickly labeled it a terrorist attack as it was in England. Malkin agreed, blaming political correctness in the United States. She mockingly asked, "What do you need to have? Neon lights that say 'Islamic jihad!" Malkin said that British progressives "brought it on themselves" due to "lax deportation policies" and an "unwillingness to screen out and profile Islamic militants." Hannity noted that England has strict gun laws, and wondered if the victim would have been able to defend himself if he had one.
Hannity brought up how the government's reaction to the Fort Hood shooting cited "workplace violence," and asked if they need to start "calling things what they are." Marshall dismissed the semantic argument and scolded Malkin for suggesting that progressives in England basically brought this upon them. She asked, "Does it matter that they're terrorists?" Hannity and Malkin both answered affirmatively, with the latter firing back that "it is not word games to call things what they are."
Malkin railed against liberals and the Obama administration for not being honest about acts of Islamic violence, and got in a brief shouting match with Marshall when Marshall insisted she always believed Fort Hood was a terrorist attack. Malkin argued that political correctness over labeling terrorist acts has very damning consequences.
"Those kinds of PC policies, lax immigration policies, refusal to do Islamic militant profiling has, yes, led to dead bodies in America and around the world. The sooner we reckon with it, the safer we'll be."
Hannity doubted that had this attack occurred in the United States, the government would not have quickly labeled it a terrorist attack as it was in England. Malkin agreed, blaming political correctness in the United States. She mockingly asked, "What do you need to have? Neon lights that say 'Islamic jihad!" Malkin said that British progressives "brought it on themselves" due to "lax deportation policies" and an "unwillingness to screen out and profile Islamic militants." Hannity noted that England has strict gun laws, and wondered if the victim would have been able to defend himself if he had one.
Hannity brought up how the government's reaction to the Fort Hood shooting cited "workplace violence," and asked if they need to start "calling things what they are." Marshall dismissed the semantic argument and scolded Malkin for suggesting that progressives in England basically brought this upon them. She asked, "Does it matter that they're terrorists?" Hannity and Malkin both answered affirmatively, with the latter firing back that "it is not word games to call things what they are."
Malkin railed against liberals and the Obama administration for not being honest about acts of Islamic violence, and got in a brief shouting match with Marshall when Marshall insisted she always believed Fort Hood was a terrorist attack. Malkin argued that political correctness over labeling terrorist acts has very damning consequences.
"Those kinds of PC policies, lax immigration policies, refusal to do Islamic militant profiling has, yes, led to dead bodies in America and around the world. The sooner we reckon with it, the safer we'll be."
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)